tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post112966384973892916..comments2024-01-25T13:46:11.967-06:00Comments on The Bronze Blog: The Bibble - Inerrant, DAMMIT!Ryan Michaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14750814560493466382noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post-1130776946318767472005-10-31T10:42:00.000-06:002005-10-31T10:42:00.000-06:00BTW, I've already responded to your predictable ap...BTW, I've already responded to your predictable apologetics re: the <A HREF="http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/gen_ml.html" REL="nofollow"> genealogy of jeebus</A> in the <A HREF="http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2005/10/18/bibble-inerrant-dammit/#comment-2751" REL="nofollow">comments section of GifS</A>. Stop by David. You'll love it!Ryan Michaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14750814560493466382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post-1130775930160408372005-10-31T10:25:00.000-06:002005-10-31T10:25:00.000-06:00David - Since it's more relevant to my guest blogg...David - <BR/><BR/>Since it's more relevant to my guest blogging on GifS, you can retort <A HREF="http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2005/10/31/the-bibble-inerrant-dammit-part-deux" REL="nofollow">right here</A>.Ryan Michaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14750814560493466382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post-1130775545062884962005-10-31T10:19:00.000-06:002005-10-31T10:19:00.000-06:001) Because one gives a legal genealogy through Jos...1) Because one gives a legal genealogy through Joseph, the other is a blood genealogy through Mary.<BR/><BR/>2) IF you did any research at all, you would know that quoting someone's words means different things at different times and in different cultures. In our time and our culture it usually means <I>exactly what the person said, word for word.</I> In other times and other cultures it means faithfully recording the content and gist of the words.<BR/><BR/>In fact, even today, in the west, we still practice a form of changing the words but staying faithful to the content. We clarify quotes by inserting words in square brackets, e.g. "Just because my sentator [Byrd of West Virginia] was in the KKK and he [George Bush] was not is irrelevant." <BR/><BR/>Like I said, there <I>are</I> some tough puzzles in the bible. Maybe you need some help in locating them?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post-1130771265053741572005-10-31T09:07:00.000-06:002005-10-31T09:07:00.000-06:00At least try a challenge that is not stupid. I mea...<I>At least try a challenge that is not stupid. I mean, people have been asking those questions for two thousand years, and you present them as if your deep research has revealed them as insoluble difficulties.</I><BR/><BR/><B>Argument from Ignorance</B><BR/><B>Argument from Age</B><BR/><BR/>Deep research? Took me about 5 seconds to find these ridiculous contradictions in your silly bibble. YOU stated the bibble was inerrant. It's not, I proved that. Easily.<BR/><BR/><I>Do you expect Tertullian, or Augustine, or Aquinas, or Luther, or Calvin, or Jonathan Edwards, were they alive to respond "the genealogies differ! Brother, I never noticed! How could I be so blind! There is no explanation for that! I recant! Rockstar, you da man?"</I><BR/><BR/><B>Argument from Authority</B><BR/><BR/>So famous Xians knew there were contradictions. That means they're no longer there?? You're being intellectually dishonest, David.<BR/><BR/><I>Likewise for your other objections. Try to be a bit original. There are some really difficult “contradictions.”</I><BR/><BR/>Sooo, you admit that the bibble has mistakes. But it's still inerrant!? David, you are the one who borders on stupidity.<BR/><BR/><I>Otherwise you look as stupid as someone going to Myer's blog or Panda's Thumb and thinking they can stop everyone in their tracks by asking "what good is half an eye?"</I><BR/><BR/>See folks, this is Xian apologetics at work. He can't back up his argument, so he comes on my blog and calls me stupid, then changes the subject. I'm not going to, David. Answer my questions:<BR/><BR/>1) Why does Jeebus have 2 different genealogies?<BR/><BR/>2) Why are 4 different things recorded as his last words? Being "last", I assume this to mean one...Ryan Michaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14750814560493466382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post-1130628466350869572005-10-29T18:27:00.000-05:002005-10-29T18:27:00.000-05:00At least try a challenge that is not stupid. I mea...At least try a challenge that is not stupid. I mean, people have been asking those questions for two thousand years, and you present them as if your deep research has revealed them as insoluble difficulties. Do you expect Tertullian, or Augustine, or Aquinas, or Luther, or Calvin, or Jonathan Edwards, were they alive to respond "the genealogies differ! Brother, I never noticed! How could I be so blind! There is no explanation for that! I recant! Rockstar, you da man?"<BR/><BR/>Likewise for your other objections. Try to be a bit original. There are some really difficult “contradictions.” Do some research and find them. Otherwise you look as stupid as someone going to Myer's blog or Panda's Thumb and thinking they can stop everyone in their tracks by asking "what good is half an eye?"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post-1130255541477691792005-10-25T10:52:00.000-05:002005-10-25T10:52:00.000-05:00Ned Flanders: "And tonight's game is Bible Trivia!...Ned Flanders: "And tonight's game is Bible Trivia!"<BR/>Rod and Tod Flanders: "Yaaaaay!"<BR/>Ned: "Which version will it be?"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post-1130202849765599472005-10-24T20:14:00.000-05:002005-10-24T20:14:00.000-05:00Hey, hasn't the bible Evolved through the years? I...Hey, hasn't the bible Evolved through the years? I mean I can make a flawless digital copy of a CD, or even the bible on CDROM, and each copy of a copy will be an exact duplicate even if it's handed down for as few thousand years and each generation makes a few copies. Even the king (Elvis)or Prince (the artist formerly known as and back again) can't press a new studio master as he sees fit. Why is the bible evolving?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com