tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post8511739098075083457..comments2024-01-25T13:46:11.967-06:00Comments on The Bronze Blog: Why Versus WhyRyan Michaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14750814560493466382noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post-43719621524967370302007-05-01T08:02:00.000-05:002007-05-01T08:02:00.000-05:00Ugh. Don't remind me about that horrible Voyager ...Ugh. Don't remind me about that horrible Voyager episode. In fact, don't remind me about Voyager in general, other than Jeri Ryan in a jumpsuit. That's not bad.King Aardvarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02785457928646226831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post-16203690770327634142007-04-30T18:16:00.000-05:002007-04-30T18:16:00.000-05:00Oh yeah, forgot to say it in the first comment: Th...Oh yeah, forgot to say it in the first comment: The result of this analysis is that the question assumes a faulty premise, that there is an ultimate reasoning behind it. As such, the only proper answer is "<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_%28negative%29" REL="nofollow">Mu!</A>"Infophilehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18309973524623338264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13030925.post-17259664986235951462007-04-30T18:14:00.000-05:002007-04-30T18:14:00.000-05:00As for the question of Why?, I prefer my "Turtles ...As for the question of <I>Why?</I>, I prefer my "Turtles all the way down" analysis. Essentially, the problem is that whenever you answer one question of why, the best you can do is move the problem of why back a step. Eventually, you'll either reach the beginning of everything for which there is no step to go back (the bottom turtle, standing on nothing), so there can be no reason for that, or you'll find that there is no end (it's turtles all the way down), so there is no ultimate reason.<BR/><BR/>If you want to see my whole post on this subject, it's over <A HREF="http://infophilia.blogspot.com/2006/10/ultimate-answer.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>, though judging by the fact that you commented on it, you might find it familiar.Infophilehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18309973524623338264noreply@blogger.com