Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Cocksnack's Back! (Part 2)

Since he's done his darndest to make a display of bravely running away, thus derailing a comment thread or two, I think I'll relocate them here, below the fold, but still in a main post, rather than let them waste away from memory in comments. Here they can be more easily referenced.

The comments are wide open in this, with only hacking forbidden. In other words, WILD THREAD!

Here's the list, by thread, including retorts from me and allied bloggers.

Originally from Doggerel #111: "Something More"
Cocksnack said...

I guess Meyers must've said a resounding no to your proposition.


7/20/2007 6:00 PM

Oh, burn. How witty. Did you learn that retort from Paris Hilton or something?

So, too cowardly to stay on topic? I'd rather not have you bring up your homoerotic fantasies on my blog.

7/20/2007 6:09 PM

grendelkhan said...

Better PZ's ass than Hank's ass, I always say.

7/23/2007 12:34 PM

Cocksnack said...

Whatever rocks your boat, dude. So long as it makes you happy.

Freak.

7/26/2007 11:08 AM

Originally from Doggerel #117: "Life"

Cocksnack said...

I sincerely believe that you all came from an illegitmate relationship between PZ Myers and his pet ape.

There is plenty of empirical evidence to prove that.

8/07/2007 10:45 AM

Bronze Dog said...

Well, another cowardly act of running away from the subject.

Anyway, what empirical evidence? Last I checked, any pet that would be described as an "ape" and humans are reproductively isolated from each other. That's why they're different species.

And what's PZ got to do with this anyway? Is your wall plastered with nude photos of him? Why are you so monomaniacal about him?

8/07/2007 10:54 AM

Infophile said...

Who knows? Cocksnack's original blog was named "Pharyngula topics" or somesuch. Maybe he just picked one popular skeptical blogger and decided we all must idolize him.

Besides all of that, it's well known that PZed is a squid, and squid and apes can't interbreed.

8/07/2007 1:34 PM

Cocksnack said...

1. PZ likes spooning with Apes.
2. You like spooning with PZ.
3. Your mom looks like an ape.
4. You are just like your mom.


8/08/2007 12:55 AM

Bronze Dog said...

Each of those premises requires evidence. If you're going to be evasively and wussily off-topic, at least be brief by including all that sort of stuff in one post.

8/08/2007 6:35 AM


Anyway, expect more to be relocated here.

18 comments:

Rev. BigDumbChimp said...

I wonder if this is the same troll exhibiting 10 year old like taunts that is pluting my blog as of late. He's back again today. Check out his latest.

Rev. BigDumbChimp said...

polluting ... stupid typos

Infophile said...

You know what's really sad? If I stray too far from the blogosphere, tactics like Cocksnacks' are not only common, they're considered the best. Just today I got mocked for whining with a "BTW: What the fuck is the electoral college? Are you fucking serious?" after making an argument (curiously, my earlier quoting of Keynes met no such reaction). It's also general consensus that "qq more" defeats any argument whatsoever.

Maybe this is why so much woo takes a foothold. People have no idea how real argument and logic works. Any well-reasoned logic gets ignored in a rash of anti-intellectualism, while short talking points and insults are given far too much credit. Perhaps Cocksnack is simply displaced from a difference culture, and is trying to win intellectual arguments through schoolyard tactics.

Brendan said...

Is it just me, or does the jerk never seem to show up in Troll Roasts or Wild Threads? He seems to find some random thread, accuse you of being PZ's lapdog, and then run. I realize this is standard troll tactic, but couldn't they at least try? After all, here's a whole thread devoted just to them. You'd think they'd relish in the attention.

Bronze Dog said...

He does stop by, but he doesn't have his old stamina. I wonder if he's realized how silly his old arguments were, abandoned Christian Creationism, and gone into theistic Secretard woo like that crazy lady suggests.

He certainly makes a lot of noise about truth being relative to arbitrary measures like fashion.

Infophile said...

While we're on the subject of trolls, there's this guy. Sadly, just because you read skeptic sites and agree with the conclusions doesn't mean you're sane.

Anonymous said...

I guess, I should assume that everyone that you think I am someone else.

I have to try to dig up this "cocksnack" up to see what he said to shut you guys up.

It is a creative name, I must say. Too bad it came from a bunch of freaks who think that interbreeding with monkeys is a cool thing.

Q said...

Considering that you claim not to that other miscreant, he completely failed his purpose considering it is he who has 'shut up' as you so put it.
I'm also very much irked by your fascination with bestiality. It's disturbing and only reflects on your own depraved desires. Your petty slander is ridiculous, and your foolish nature is very much plain to see.

For the rest of you, I think you're doing an excellent job. I've become somewhat addicted to reading you give guys like your friend above his what-for. I'm pretty useless on the the arguments myself, but seeing such articulate and cutting responses to base drivel gives me ideas on how to deal with this sort of thing in the future (though admittedly, I haven't encountered much of it here in NZ). Thanks for that.

Bronze Dog said...

Hey, the IP address fit the first time, and the style's still dead-on.

But anyway, let's entertain the thought that you're not him for a moment:

He hasn't done a thing to shut us up. His posts full of Creationist cliches were a source of laughter for us, especially when he tried to claim that us using links to refute his unoriginal copy-pasted was "lazy refutation" and failed because truth was relative to laziness, popularity, and whatever else. He forced a laugh at my efforts to tell him that truth was objective and absolute.

After he was reduced to tears from us always having a retort on hand for every irrelevancy, outright lie, and every misunderstanding that even my Texas public school upbringing debunked at 7th grade, he started turning to gay "jokes", usually involving PZ Myers.

In short, Cocksnack, as we nicknamed him, was another cookie-cutter troll who couldn't take any opposition and propped himself up as an intellectual giant because he could copy-paste cookie-cutter debates and shout that the atheist lost, when it was plain to anyone with any knowledge of philosophy or epistemology that the Creationist was humiliated.

Infophile said...

I will admit that there was one thing Cocksnack said which briefly led to my choosing not to argue directly with him. Take the following exchange:

Infophile: So, if someone convinced you the Bible weren't true, you'd abandon your morals and go on a murderous rampage? ...Excuse me if I've lost the urge to argue with you; I suddenly don't want to win.

Cocksnack: Actually, I would answer yes. The Bible would not be the best selling book for all these years because (as you would like to think) people are stupid.


Winning a debate with one person just isn't worth creating a mass murderer.

stogoe said...

Don't worry, infophile, there's no way to 'win' against cocksnack, at least in his own mind. We have relatively little to fear.

Fire Walk said...

Damnit BronzeDog, now I have the "Top Cat" theme in my head and a need to write a parody that isn't just playground taunts.

Anonymous said...

Ha! I just got this computer 3 months ago. But if from looking at other debates give any clue, he probably wooped your ass. That's why you have to call him cocksnack to make yourself feel better.

But if a cocksnack can woop your ass, I wonder what a reall cock will do to you.

Ha! 2% Losers!

You can go home and kiss your monkeys, freaks.

Bronze Dog said...

Right. He "wooped our ass" by resorting to grade school gay jokes exactly like you.

He also ran away screaming whenever we called him on his redefinitions like you did with "Communist".

And he'd also run from anything resembling empirical evidence and try to claim that us not personally doing everything ourselves maaaaagically altered reality so that everything we said wasn't true: Truth, according to him, was relative to personal laziness. I had to lecture him on truth being objective and absolute.

He also resorted to unproductive copy-pastes that had been refuted thousands of times, as if they'd cease being refuted over a century ago.

He was only marginally more effective than Jesusfreak who only posts stuff like "Evoape!", "I win!", and "Demon!", only in all caps.

Translation: Cocksnack earned his nickname from being a stereotypical loud, uninformed troll. I suppose he also thought truth was relative to how high-pitched and whiny he was in his posts.

All "I am God in all but name!" ego with no content.

Q said...

Hmm, so getting a brand new computer for the sole purpose of making yourself look like a jackass? A wise spending decision. Your 'victory', just like CS's, is all totally imagined. As for the challenge of a real cock, you're doing no better.

And your consistent bringing up of monkeys is laughable. All this coming from someone who'd rather fellate their god.

Rev. BigDumbChimp said...

FYI dumbass. A new computer doesn't necessarily change your IP address.

Ryan said...

God damn rock bands. Made me miss the triumphant return of Cocksnack.

Tom Foss said...

If by "triumphant" you mean "even more pathetic than usual," then you're right.